Review | Bitter Orange, Marshall Moore

Bitter-Orange-Cover-Shadow-V6Marshall Moore’s short story collection The Infernal Republic explored experiences of ennui and despair beneath a veneer of the absurd. The author takes this a step further in the more sober novel Bitter Orange. The protagonist, Seth Harrington, can turn undetectable — note: not invisible, but more like he’s “stepping out of time” — in morally grey situations. He can, for example, steal a bottle of wine right under the sharp-eyed, sharp-tongued shopkeeper’s eyes, or use a one dollar bill to pay for a cell phone. It’s like a Jedi mind trick, but one that works only when doing bad things.

Can such a power be used for good? Possibly, but for Seth, the question doesn’t even arise. Nor, for the most part, does the question of how to use this power to become a supervillain and conquer the world. Rather, this power exists, here’s what it seems to be able to do, now what? When you have the ability to do what you want without having to face the consequences (because no one will witness what you’ve done), what will you do? Remember being a kid and told not to do something because your mother/teacher/a police officer will catch you? For the religious, perhaps it’s the idea of an omnipresent god that deters bad behaviour. Yet, when you remove the threat of external responsibility, when you are pretty much guaranteed that you will not be caught, then the question becomes: now what? And, more importantly, so what?

It’s in that “so what?” that Moore’s social commentary strikes home. Bitter Orange is set in the post-9/11 world. Like many people, Seth has been affected by the event — most of the time, the experience of shared grief is viewed as a comfort (you are not alone), yet Moore presents the less acknowledged, less explored alienating aspect of shared grief. When so many people have undergone the same thing, many of whom may have undergone worse (who can say whose grief is worse?), where does your pain fit in, why does it matter?

Seth’s power makes him fear he himself is disappearing for real, again a not-too-subtle metaphor for the feeling of insignificance (the “so what?”) created by events like 9/11. At a time when all Seth wants to do is connect, he obtains a power that sets him apart, even from his closest friends. Moore’s resolution does provide somewhat of an answer, but by no means a definitive one. Perhaps most powerful in Moore’s book is the focus not on grief or pain, but rather on what comes after. Even Seth’s powers don’t lead so much into any tortured soul-searching as to soul searching with a somewhat flat affect, deliberately so. It’s ennui, it’s pointlessness, and it’s even more soul destroying than the pain.

Personally, I prefer Moore’s short fiction — the shorter format distills his message and renders it more potent. With the novel format, the story tends to meander. Subplots, such as Seth’s one-time female lover refusing to believe he’s really gay, are intriguing and do add to the plot, but they could have been more tightly integrated with the story. The ending was unexpected, but, as with the author’s less successful short fiction, Moore goes for the easy dramatic flourish. I find Moore at his best in the quiet moments, the subtle layers that reveal much more than what is said, and particularly with a subject as complex and stirring as dealing with a post-9/11 world, quiet is more telling than volume. Still, there’s a lot going on in Bitter Orange that is worth checking out, and a lot more that bears reflection even after you turn the last page.

+

Thank you to the author for a copy of this book in exchange for an honest review.

Review | The Blondes, Emily Schultz

cover-1They call it the Blonde Fury. For no apparent reason, blonde girls and women are turning into homicidal maniacs — zombies that rip people to shreds and spread death and destruction around the world. For some reason, the virus affects only females, and it affects even those with dyed hair. Emily Schultz’s The Blondes is a sharp social commentary on gender relations and the premium placed on physical beauty. Despite a concept that could quite easily have become a hilarious B movie, Schultz takes the cerebral route, a thoughtful, academic blonde zombie thriller.

Much of the tone is due to the protagonist: Hazel Hayes is a PhD candidate doing her thesis on aesthetology or “what women look like and what we think they look like.” [p. 8] Part of the story is pure zombie thriller — Hazel is pregnant and alone in the woods waiting for the wife of her baby’s father to come back for her. The Blonde Fury has taken the world hostage and Hazel is terrified about the world her baby will be born into. Yet because of her academic background, Hazel is hyper-aware of the socio-cultural issues the author brings to light. Scenes of blonde women throwing furniture around are sandwiched between flashbacks of academic discussions on the Hollywood preference for blondes during the silent film era, because dark haired women were too “ethnic,” and therefore dangerous. Beyond the immediate irony is sharp satire — why does hair colour render a woman “harmless,” and more importantly, is the preference for a more generic type of beauty systemic of a larger disenfranchisement of female power?

At one point (and tellingly before the Blonde Fury had been diagnosed), Hazel discusses her thesis with an expert in the field (also tellingly, a blonde, beautiful woman):

“Beautiful women are full of anger over their privilege,” I said. “They use deceit as a kind of trade. They receive more attention than other women, and want to be the centre of attention at all times. It’s an addiction. And like all addicts, they’re controlling and abusive, full of insecurity and rage.”

“Oh my,” Kovacs said. I think she bit her glass a little. “Is that what you really think? […] This is personal for you.” [p. 79-80]

In the character of Hazel, Schultz turns the spotlight on to the unfortunate reality that the subjugation of women is done just by men — women too are guilty of putting other women down. Hazel admits she may “simply [be] afraid of beautiful people,” and her self-awareness offers a certain perspective by which to read this book.

As a story, there are quite a few weaknesses. The virus affecting even peroxide blondes makes sense from the social commentary perspective, but makes zero sense scientifically, as does the way that shaving off hair protects you from the virus. The shifts between time periods got very confusing, and while I’m usually fine with ambiguous endings, this one just seemed to peter out.

Still, as social commentary, The Blondes is potent. Schultz subverts the stereotype of the brainless blonde by turning them into violent zombies. She also explores the fear of female power and the resulting objectification to subdue that power. In the book, the object of fear is given form — the real-life fear of women taking over corporate boardrooms and governments (and yes, unfortunately there are still people who believe a woman’s place is in the kitchen) is concretized in the characters’ fears that women will take over the world by killing everyone else. That blondes are targeted is significant, given the premium society places on blonde beauty, as stereotyped in the Barbie doll.

Perhaps most potent is the idea that the subjugation of one type of woman (in this case, blondes) eventually leads to the subjugation of all. In a twist that’s distressing because it’s so believable, women who travel are asked to present their pubic hair for inspection for any trace of blonde-ness. The degradation and the humiliation are horrific, yet is that really so far from the ridiculous amounts of security checks we go through at airports? Is that really so different from the intense scrutiny many women are subjected to on a regular basis, when their physical appearance is given primary importance?

Like any good satire, The Blondes takes elements from real life and blows them up to absurd proportions. And, as with any good satire, we soon realize that the absurdity we’d just found so humorous is far too close to reality for comfort.

+

Minor aside, just because I love it so much — kudos to CS Richardson for an amazing, amazing cover design.

+

Thank you to Random House Canada for a copy of this book in exchange for an honest review.

On Bookshops and Booksellers | Glad Day Bookshop

Last week, I walked into Glad Day Bookshop for the first time. I’d known about it, of course, and kept meaning to check it out, but I just never got around to it. I used to work at Nicholas Hoare Books, and when it shut down, I’ve heard many people say how much they loved it, that they were there several years ago and always meant to come back, but never got around to it. One person can’t keep a store in business, of course, and I’m sure Glad Day would have happily continued its operations whether or not I myself walked in. But I, at least, would have missed out, as I’ve missed out on the Sherlock Holmes exhibit the Toronto Reference Library held earlier this year, and the Ultimate Dinos exhibit at the Royal Ontario Museum, also earlier this year. All because I never got around to dropping by. (An aside: I thought I’d missed out on Sleuth of Baker Street, which I heard closed down last year, but their website is still up and running, with a June 2013 newsletter, so perhaps I may still get a chance to visit!)

Source: BlogTO

In the case of Glad Day, it was an impulse decision to attend a book launch that finally got me in the doors. The launch was on the third floor of the building, what I believe to be an art gallery/event space, and it was packed. So after I had a chance to speak to the author, I escaped the crowd and entered the bookshop on the second floor — still busy, but at least with enough room to walk around.

I love entering bookstores for the first time. There’s a tradition in the Philippines on entering churches for the first time: you say a prayer and then  you get to make a wish, which will supposedly be granted. (Mine never were, but to be fair, perhaps the tradition required praying the entire rosary or something, and I conveniently forgot everything except the wish part.) I have my own tradition in entering bookstores for the first time: I like to find at least one book to purchase. This is particularly true for indie shops, where I hope to find a book I’d never have discovered at a chain retailer.

So imagine by delight when I checked out the fiction section at Glad Day, saw quite a few with prices marked down, and realized I didn’t recognize many of the authors. If you aren’t aware of Glad Day, they are the world’s oldest LGBTQ bookshop. I do read books by LGBTQ authors or with LGBTQ content, but among the Hollinghursts and Wintersons were books I’d never heard of, by authors I’d never read. To an avid reader, there is no more exhilarating feeling than that. I was off to an adventure!

I remember a similar feeling when I first walked into Bakka Phoenix, Toronto’s premier Science Fiction/Fantasy bookstore, a few years ago. It was exciting, but also, I admit, somewhat intimidating. I knew I was in the mood for something new, but had no idea what. So I walked up to the bookseller and asked what she’s read recently that she really liked. She asked me what kind of SFF I liked to read. I was stumped. I do read the genre and I love watching Star Trek, but I don’t necessarily follow any SFF writer’s work in particular, and, surrounded by shelves upon shelves of the genre, it was daunting to make such a confession. The bookseller was wonderful — she was friendly and explained that her recommendation would depend on what I liked to read, and that what she liked may not be what I would like — but I admit, I was intimidated. So I stammered something about Neil Gaiman, Philip K. Dick and Margaret Atwood, wishing the whole time I could name a more obscure author so I wouldn’t feel like such a poser. I think I ended up scurrying out of the store with one of the staff picks.

Scott, the bookseller at Glad Day, seemed much more cheerful, and I decided to give it a go. So I walked up to him and said, “What was the best novel you’ve read recently, that you have available in this store?” To his credit, he didn’t even have the deer in the headlights look I did whenever a customer at Nicholas Hoare asked me that question. And to my relief, he didn’t tilt his head thoughtfully and ask me what I liked to read. Instead, he said, “There’s this amazing book, and I just hope we haven’t sold the last copy… Aha! We do have one copy left!” He came back with this:

12000020

He handed it to me and said (as best I can remember): “It’s about two boys who are friends. One is gay but people don’t talk about it & one has a brother in prison and all these family issues that aren’t discussed. So it’s about friendship & family & things that people try not to talk about. YA but good for adults.”

I’d heard of this book, I’d loved the title, but just never got around to actually reading it. (Book information here.) And, quite frankly, the fact that the bookseller didn’t even have to think before picking it up and that he was so enthusiastic about it convinced me of its appeal. So I bought it, and I read it, and if I don’t get a chance to blog about it, let me just say I absolutely loved it. One of the best books I’ve read all year, and personally, one of the most underrated ones. Read it. And buy it from Glad Day if you can.

One of the things about being a book blogger and about having worked as a bookseller is that some of the bookseller/customer magic is gone. As a book blogger, I’m generally aware of new releases, and any books I would like to read I’m already generally reading for my blog. As a former bookseller, I’ve had customers tell me how magical Nicholas Hoare Books is to them, and how amazing their experience always is in that store. I appreciate the sentiment, but haven’t exactly experienced it in a while. It’s work — fun, exciting work, but a job nonetheless. This visit to Glad Day was the first time in a while that I really felt that magic I missed, and the first time in a while that I realized what an experience a really good bookseller can create for a reader. In telling me why he loved Aristotle and Dante so much, Scott was inviting me to enter this wonderful literary landscape, one that I wouldn’t have entered on my own, and yet now barely want to leave.

So thank you, Scott of Glad Day Bookshop. I loved Aristotle and Dante so much I came back and asked for the second best novel he’d read recently. He suggested Abigail Tarttelin’s Golden Boy and admitted he usually reads non-fiction rather than novels. I told him to hit me up anyway, and he came up with three non-fiction books that he spoke about as passionately as he did Aristotle and Dante. On my second visit, I left Glad Day with two new books in hand. Scott hasn’t let me down yet, and my apologies to him in advance, but if I love these new books just as much, I’m afraid I will be back. And I’m afraid I will put him on the spot yet again — what’s the next best book (fiction or non-fiction) he’s read recently?

I tweeted about this experience and Jennifer Dawson (@BookishJojo) suggested I turn it into a blog post series: visiting bookstores and asking booksellers for the best book they’ve read recently. (Full conversation here.) Might turn out to be an expensive hobby, but I admit, a fascinating one as well. Why not, eh?

And in the meantime, if you’ll excuse me, I have a couple new books I’m dying to read.