Review | Confessions of a Fairy’s Daughter, Alison Wearing

coverWhen a former boyfriend meets her father for the first time, “his hands flittering around in the air like manic butterflies,” Alison Wearing smiles proudly and says, “That’s not a stereotype. That’s my dad.” [p. 9] Confessions of a Fairy’s Daughter: Growing up with a Gay Dad
is a heartfelt, honest memoir about a young girl dealing with the discovery that her father is gay. LGBTQ rights still have quite an uphill battle these days, but Alison Wearing’s father had an even more difficult time of it. Among the most fascinating chapters in the book deal with the Toronto gay scene in the 1980s, including the horrific story of brutal police raids of gay bath houses. “What have the police got against cleanliness?” Margaret Atwood quips. [p. 106] While more about a family’s personal struggle than the wider social context, Wearing’s memoir has some sharp insights into gay life in Toronto, particularly from her father.

“If I’d been born ten years earlier, it’s very possible that I would never have come out at all,” he said in response to something I had asked about the timing of it, his being in the vanguard of the gay revolution. “And if I’d been born ten years later, most probably I would never have married.” [p. 162]

Wearing’s father has had a long time to think about his sexuality, and his tentative forays into accepting it wholly, even with a wife and children back home, are portrayed with sensitivity. On one hand, you can’t help but cheer him on, as he meets other gay fathers and realizes he isn’t the only man who married a woman in order to conform to social norms. Wearing writes about how gay fathers were ostracized even within the gay community, as if their marriage to women were a betrayal of the gay movement. Her father’s struggle to accept himself and his ultimate decision to live openly as a gay man are both courageous decisions, particularly in the politically charged atmosphere of the eighties, and it’s painful to read how he is rejected even by some of his closest family members.

On the other hand, and Wearing’s sensitivity to multiple points of view aids in this, her father’s decision to come out of the closet affected not just him, but his family as well. In some ways, Wearing is lucky because both her parents are very loving and have always taken care of her and her siblings. As a schoolfriend whose parents are constantly fighting points out, “So your father’s a faggot, big whoop. At least he’s not a lying, cheating, son-of-a-bitch, drunken asshole.” [p. 100] Still, Wearing’s father’s homosexuality does cause the end of his marriage, and Wearing writes with great sensitivity about her experience as the daughter of divorced parents.

It never occurred to me to hate Dad for being gay […] What I did hate was the Greyhound bus, that long sprint on the dog’s back to and from Toronto. […] I hated the shame my mother wore in her eyes […] But more than anything else, I hated all the stories I needed to invent about my life, the dancing pink elephant in the room that I spent my adolescence trying to conceal. [p. 118 – 119]

A few chapters later, Wearing says that the gay part is incidental; it is the parenting part that is important. And in some ways, her experience is touchingly similar to other kids whose parents have separated for other reasons. The elephant she tries to conceal may be dancing and pink, but many families have their own elephants to hide. In this way, Wearing takes what at first seems like a very difficult experience to imagine — how would it feel to have a gay father? — and makes it familiar and relatable. When she wonders why her father “can’t keep being normal during the week and just go to Toronto to be gay on the weekends” [p. 86], it’s a poignant appeal to at least the appearance of normal family life, while still allowing her father (partial) freedom to be happy.

Possibly the most compelling figure in this story is Wearing’s mother, and to the author’s credit, she gives her mother’s less glamourous, less politically charged, story its due. Wearing even includes a few chapters with her mother’s point of view — sadly, it isn’t quite as extensive as Wearing’s own account or her father’s, but that is due more to the mother’s desire for privacy than anything. While Wearing’s father grappled with his sexuality, her mother was left to be the anchor for the children. Thus, when Wearing’s mother started dating another man, Wearing was furious: “Terrified, actually. Convinced she was going to disappear too.” [p. 124]

Wearing’s mother was the source of stability for her children, giving them something to cling on to even when their father spent a lot of time away from home. To Wearing’s credit, she is aware of the unfairness of her behaviour towards her mother.

It wouldn’t have dawned on me to create such drama over one of my dad’s departures. He had come and gone for so long, I never imagined I had any control over his whereabouts. And he had always had a social life outside the house. But if the double standard drove my mother “round the bend,” she never pointed it out to me. [p. 125 – 126]

This, too, is a form of heroism, much quieter than the courage displayed by Wearing’s father in coming out, but no less important. I only wish I got to hear more of the story from Wearing’s mother’s perspective.

Confessions of a Fairy’s Daughter is a tender, often amusing memoir. Wearing’s affection for her parents, and her desire to understand them, shine through and add emotional weight to their stories. I can’t even begin to comprehend the struggles gay individuals face today, never mind in the 1980s when homosexuality was just starting to fight for acceptance. But in Wearing’s book at least, love seems to go quite a long way.

+

Thank you to Random House Canada for an advance reading copy of this book in exchange for an honest review.

Review | The Andalucian Friend, Alexander Söderberg

coverThe Andalucian Friend by Alexander Söderberg is a fairly typical thriller. It is as “turbo-charged” and “action-packed” as the publisher blurb promises, yet it lacks the emotional punch that might’ve made it stand out.

Nurse and single mother Sophie Brinkmann unwittingly gets caught up in a world of crime and violence when her boyfriend Hector Guzman turns out to be a crime lord locked in a drugs/weapons trade war with a rival German group. Add to the mix a group of cops with shady methods and even shadier motives, and you have the makings of a real page-turner.

Unfortunately, you also have the potential to create a complete mess. To Söderberg’s credit, he does keep his multiple plot lines under tight control. Still, a lot of the story was just confusing and while the character list at the beginning of the book could’ve helped in keeping the characters straight, there just wasn’t enough differentiation between characters to care. Söderberg’s characters have obscure motives and engage in double dealing, which again could’ve been very intriguing, but instead there were just too many too soon, and with not enough at stake to make you care. Similar types of stories succeed by having at least one character who anchors the whole story, and whose fate keeps us glued to the pages, for example Smiley in John Le Carre’s novels or Lisbeth Salander in Stieg Larsson’s trilogy. Presumably, Sophie was meant to anchor this novel, but even she got lost among the large cast.

The book does get better — Söderberg just takes his time to get there, but eventually we do get to know some of the characters better, they become more distinct from each other, and the twists have a bit more of an impact. Particularly strong is the subplot about Sophie’s son, and how his life is turned upside down by his mother’s connection to Hector Guzman. The final few chapters are the best part — Söderberg ramps up the adrenaline and all the various subplots come crashing together. The climax is a bit of a typical resolution scene in a shoot ’em up TV show or movie, though the descriptions are a bit gorier than network TV.

Overall, not a bad book. The beginning is confusing and the characters weren’t well developed for most of the story. The language is also a bit clunky, which could’ve been a translation issue. It might have worked better as an action-thriller movie, where character development, particularly for minor villain characters, doesn’t matter as much, and where the high-adrenaline scenes might have had more impact. Still, the character revelations near the end of the book are interesting, the subplot regarding Sophie’s son is unexpectedly moving, and the action-packed pace did keep me reading. Andalucian Friend is an okay book, just not a memorable one.

+

Thank you to Random House Canada for a copy of this book in exchange for an honest review.

Review | The Supremes at Earl’s All-You-Can-Eat, Edward Kelsey Moore

coverOn the back flap of Edward Kelsey Moore’s The Supremes at Earl’s All-You-Can-Eatthe author writes that the story is rooted in childhood memories of “eavesdropping on the women of the family as they talked at family gatherings.” Indeed, reading the book feels like being at a family gathering filled with loud, warm-hearted aunties eager to share the latest gossip. Supremes is a charming book, and a lovely reading experience.

Odette, Clarice and Barbara Jean are old friends who still meet weekly at Earl’s All-You-Can-Eat. Odette can speak to ghosts (including a hilarious Eleanor Roosevelt who likes to hover near people who are near death), Clarice’s husband is cheating on her, and Barbara Jean battles alcoholism. Moore has a gift for characterization — each woman and her personal story feels real, and you can almost imagine them across the restaurant from you. The story is set in a small town, and the diner setting as well as the way the townspeople all seem to know each other, give the story a lovely, timeless feel, even in the more contemporary sections. 

Odette in particular stands out as a friend one would love to have. She’s loud, funny and not afraid to tell you exactly what she thinks. If you’ve read The Baby Sitters Club, imagine a large, African American, more blunt, version of Kristy Thomas. So when a serious illness and the ghost of Eleanor Roosevelt (to Moore’s credit, he pulls off what could’ve been a cheesy plot device) force Odette to face her own mortality, the sudden glimpse into her vulnerability is heartbreaking. In true Odette style, however, she continues to be her sharp, wisecracking self, making the reader wish even more than ever that Odette somehow can defeat even death.

I loved reading the stories of these women. Their experiences, in many ways, are so far from my own, but the book still made me think of my own high school friends, and how we would imagine a future where we’d all still be as close as we were in school. Unlike Odette, Clarice and Barbara Jean, my high school friends and I no longer live in the same town, nor even in the same country, and so years can go by before I get to meet up with them. We’re still really close — and I feel very fortunate in that regard. Still, reading Moore’s book made me wish I had my own Earl’s All-You-Can-Eat. A place I can go to once a week, a second home I’ve had since childhood, and a tradition that my friends and I have formed years ago and still manage to keep alive. There’s an appeal in that constancy, somewhat like a real-life Pop Tate’s that has somehow never gone out of business. Moore’s book is set in contemporary times, but there is such a timeless feel to it.

It would be naive to say that Moore’s story calls to mind a simpler time. The lives of its three protagonists are certainly far from simple — they deal with racism, gender inequality, adultery, and even the strength of their friendship isn’t enough to combat these. And yet this book is a comfort. There is such a feeling of family and friendship and a sense of permanence we look to ascribe to certain places. Moore draws us into this world, and we recognize something of our own lives in it, and we just really, really want to stay.

+

Thank you to Random House Canada for a copy of this book in exchange for an honest review.