Crunch Time, Diane Mott Davidson #50BookPledge

I’m a huge Goldy Schulz fan, so when I saw Diane Mott Davidson finally had a new book out, I pre-ordered the e-book immediately. Unfortunately, I did not like Crunch Time. I suppose I should have been warned by “A Novel of Suspense” on the cover. Goldy Schulz novels have never been about the thrills – they’re about the warmth, the humour, and yes, the food. Crunch Time tries so hard to be about the “suspense” that it ends up with a whole lot of half-developed plot points, frenetic plot twists and new characters who just don’t make me care.

Ernest, a private investigator, is killed, and his live-in cook Yolanda and her great-aunt Ferdinanda are friends of Goldy, so they come to live with her while looking for a new place. Ernest was working on several cases (a fishy dog breeding mill, a divorce case involving possible adultery, a generations-old stolen diamonds case, and Yolanda’s abusive, stalker ex-husband), so he had quite a list of people who’d wanted him dead. Yolanda is a suspect and Goldy, being Goldy, decides to help her out by finding the real killer. Classic Goldy Schulz plot.

Here are the problems. Yolanda and Ferdinanda are just plain annoying. Ferdinanda is the classic feisty elderly lady. She talks non-stop, she takes over Goldy’s kitchen, and she confidently wields a baton against men. She does have her likable moments, but for the most part, I felt more sympathy for the man she was yelling at or whacking with the baton. Yolanda claims her ex-husband abused her (again a classic theme in Goldy Schulz novels), and so is understandably jumpy. Unfortunately, Davidson handled this type of character much better with Goldy (whose fear made her sympathetic) and Marla (whose spunk made her admirable), mostly because we saw just how bad their ex-husband, the Jerk, could be. Yolanda’s ex is barely developed and even Goldy sometimes questions whether Yolanda has even been abused in the first place, so Yolanda just comes off as hysterical. Characters in fiction need not be likable, but if the lovable protagonist risks herself and her equally lovable family for them, they should at least be likable enough to be worth that risk.

Other minor characters irked me as well. One suspect for example is a man who literally faints at the sight of blood. He had at least three scenes of blood-related fainting incidents, which I personally thought was at least two too many. The first time was surprising, and somewhat amusing. After a while, it turned into slapstick that tried too hard either to be funny or to establish that this character is a wimp.

Also, I don’t know if Goldy’s nosiness has always been this annoying, or if I just don’t think this case is worth her meddling. I’ve always found Goldy charming – I like how she mostly just wants a quiet life as a caterer, and yet ends up embroiled in mysteries because she or a good friend (like Julian Teller) or family member (like the Jerk) is accused of a crime. Because the stakes are usually so high and she tries to find an answer quickly so she can get back to her usual life, I cheer her on when she bends the rules, ignores police warnings and gets into dangerous situations. In Crunch Time, Goldy seems to have developed a taste for detecting, and has morphed from an ordinary mother/caterer into a wannabe cop/busybody. At one point, she enlists someone’s help to drug a suspect so she can collect evidence, then later fabricates evidence to collect even more evidence. This type of mystery always requires a suspension of disbelief when it comes to chains of evidence, but even I couldn’t swallow all that. Nor could I help thinking, Goldy’s police officer husband Tom seems more than capable, why not tell him what she knows and let him handle things?

The plot twists and red herrings in this book just pile up, and it wasn’t so much confusing at it was unnecessary. Davidson emphasizes the most random things, which make me think they are significant, but end up being just bits of colour to add to characters. At least two people for example ask Yolanda why she calls Ferdinanda Aunt instead of Great Aunt. In real life, I just don’t see people caring about that, so I thought the inconsistency would mean something later on. Spoiler: either it didn’t, or I missed it completely. Later on, Ferdinanda hangs a Santeria mask on Goldy’s door, which makes Tom protest. Santeria masks do play a role later on, but the fact that Ferdinanda insisted on hanging the mask up despite Tom’s (the house owner’s!) objections meant nothing at all, from what I could tell.

It was good seeing old favourites again, and I love seeing Goldy’s son Arch, whom I first met as a shy, awkward eleven year old, now a popular, confident athletic sixteen year old. So he’s a fencer, which isn’t exactly the height of cool, from what I can remember of high school, but still, it’s nice to see him all grown up. The always entertaining Marla was, like Goldy, more annoyingly gossipy here, but even worse, she was barely involved at all in the case. Even an annoying Marla is much better as Goldy’s sidekick than Yolanda and Ferdinanda. Tom and Goldy’s relationship has progressed somewhat, and it’s nice seeing them having sex more often than in previous books. They’re a cute couple, and I like seeing them happy.

Finally, and I admit this should a minor, ridiculous gripe, I miss Goldy’s constant cooking. In previous books, she cooks every time she gets stressed out (which is often), and Davidson describes the most mouth watering recipes in these scenes. Goldy still does cook, and Davidson does include a list of recipes, but at least half the time in this book, when Goldy goes to the kitchen, she finds that Ferdinanda has already cooked something sumptuous. We still get the description of how heavenly Ferdinanda’s meals are, but it isn’t quite the same as seeing the meal created.

Minor question to Goldy Schulz fans – how religious was she in previous books, beyond teaching Sunday school and catering church functions? She just seemed very preachy here (commenting about sins and commandments), and the scene where she is stressed out and goes to light candles in church rather than cook surprised me. Not a big deal, and certainly, a character can change. Just struck me as odd.

9 thoughts on “Crunch Time, Diane Mott Davidson #50BookPledge

  1. I too was disappointed in Crunch Time because Davidson has fallen into the baby trap, the tired old device used by mystery authors when they can’t think of a way to keep their plots fresh: let the protagonist get pregnant or try to get pregnant or think about getting pregnant. Enough already! Every time a writer uses this hackneyed trick, I stop reading her books. I gave up on Tamar Myers when Magdalena had Little Jacob, swore off Donna Andrews when Meg got pregnant, and now that Arly Hanks is expecting, . I’m saying farewell to Joan Hess. Goldy has an almost-grown son and a great catering career; she would be out of her mind to go back to diapers and 3 AM feedings, and I’m disappointed that Tom would ask it of her.

    • I totally agree, Mary! On one hand, it’s sweet for the relationship to develop even more, but it also just feels like the author has run out of ideas on how to move the story forward. That’s what I like about series like Brunetti or Barnaby. The characters’ personal lives are settled & the author can focus on other aspects, like the mystery.

      Maybe with Archie growing up, Diane didn’t want to put Goldy through empty nest syndrome?

  2. No one is as livid as I that she thinks it’s okay to present a veterinarian-school drop-out spaying puppies so that they can put canisters of marijuana in their now-empty body cavities to transport the illegal drugs? I just finished the book and am going to contact the ASPCA and her publisher next week with complaints. She doesn’t even apologize for using this heinous circumstance as a vehicle for moving her story line! The other criticism are on point, as well and about a quarter of the way into the book memories of problems I finally had reading her years ago came back to me – absolutely no fidelity in confidentiality of police procedures by her husband or any of his colleagues and more than tolerance of her antics, some sort of outright grudging acceptance of them by the guy. Yes, recipes get short shrift here, too. Altogether an unfortunate book and I think the author and her publisher need to be taken to task for setting forth such ideas of animal abuse as are portrayed in this book.

    • Hi Barbara, I too have a difficult time reading about animal abuse, and I think the problem is exacerbated in Crunch Time just because it feels so unnecessary, with all the other subplots going on. I might borrow the next Goldy Schulz book from the library; I’ve loved the other books in the series and still hope the next one will be better.

  3. I haven’t read Crunch Time yet, but I’m really, really getting tired of the way Goldy lies to Tom. Tom seems like a great guy…why doesn’t Goldy value that instead of hiding things from him and lying to him in every book, not to mention making him look like an ass with the sheriff’s department? I find myself thinking Tom would be better off without Goldy.

    • It seems to be fairly standard in these types of mysteries — the protective love interest who disapproves of the protagonist’s getting involved in dangerous matters. Still, I do agree that Tom’s amazing. He’s super understanding, and Goldy should definitely trust him more. He also seems really competent, so at times I wonder why Goldy doesn’t just let him handle the investigation, as he seems more than capable of solving it himself.

  4. Pingback: Guest Post: Five Mystery Series to Hook You In – Lost in a Great Book

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s