Review | Into the Darkest Corner, Elizabeth Haynes

Quite possibly one of the worst things about being the victim of a crime is feeling judged yourself. It’s perfectly natural to think of your own actions and agonize over how you could have prevented the crime, or how, if circumstances were different, you might’ve escaped it altogether. Among the most empowering things, therefore, for a victim of crime to hear, apart from that the perpetrator has been caught, are “You’re not alone” and “It’s not your fault.” Some are fortunate enough to learn that right away, others need a bit more time. But what if you don’t hear that at all? What if the people you trust the most tell you that you are at fault, that in fact, you are lying and not a victim of crime at all? When Catherine Bailey, the heroine of Elizabeth Haynes’ debut novel Into the Darkest Corner, calls herself “such a fool” for not having escaped an abusive relationship with Lee when she had the chance, I wanted to hug her and tell her not to blame herself. When she thinks about how her parents’ death led to her going to bars, flirting with strangers and eventually meeting Lee, I wanted to tell her that it’s useless to dwell on the what if’s, that in fact, her anger should be towards Lee and not towards herself or her past. I wanted to be the friend she so clearly needed.

Into the Darkest Corner is a difficult book to read, and I mean that as a testament to how amazing it is. Haynes has crafted a terrifying, emotional, claustrophobic story of abuse. My copy (photo on the left) is filed with Post-It notes and marginal scribbles, mostly comments like “Argh! You liar!” referring to Lee. Rarely have I marked up a book so much — Darkest Corner has provoked that much from me.

I detested Lee from the very beginning. The novel opens with Lee’s trial in 2005, where he testifies that Catherine was an emotionally unbalanced girlfriend whose obsessive jealousy caused him to snap and punch her — the “first time [he’d] ever hit a woman,” and allegedly an act of self-defense. This may be because I already knew from the book’s back cover that Lee was the jealous one with a “darker side,” but this scene just made me sick. How dare this man not just beat up his girlfriend but now try to paint her as the one at fault?

The novel is structured so that the story of Catherine and Lee’s developing relationship in 2003 (pre-trial) is told in alongside (in alternating scenes) the story of Catherine in 2007 (post-trial). It took me a while to get into this structure, mostly because I felt I already knew how the 2003 storyline was going to turn out, and I wanted to get on with the rest of the story. I soon found myself liking Haynes’ choice of structure however — the scenes of Catherine being carefree and flirting with the handsome, mysterious Lee are especially heart-wrenching when contrasted with the perennially frightened Catherine in 2007, who suffers from OCD and practically has to be dragged to the office Christmas party.

Even when Catherine was really in love with Lee, I never found him attractive. There was a major red flag from the beginning — Lee’s secrecy about his job — though I guess I could see how that would have a dark, brooding stranger type appeal. I do wish I saw a bit more of Lee’s charming side, just so I can understand how Catherine could have fallen so hard, and how her friends could have been so won over.

I have rarely detested a character as much as I do Lee. He’s just creepy and controlling. For example, he switches around the knives and forks in Catherine’s kitchen drawer. When Catherine demands to know why he did it, he replies, “I just wanted you to know I was looking out for you.” Catherine admits she feels uncomfortable without knowing why, and that was one point when I wanted to just yell at her — how can you not know why that creeps you out? Talk about the heebie-jeebies! To Catherine’s credit, she does ask him not to do it again instead of just letting it alone.

Haynes does an amazing job of putting us in Catherine’s frame of mind. It was terrifying to see Lee’s controlling tendencies escalate, to the point that even when Catherine realizes how much she needs to escape this relationship, it’s already too late. Several times in the margins, I’ve written “how to escape?” The story at times felt claustrophobic — Catherine’s experience of being trapped by Lee felt so real that even I, who knew he’d be convicted in 2005, saw no way out.

In contrast to Lee is Stuart, Catherine’s neighbour in 2007, who is a psychologist and who wants to help her deal with her OCD. I was initially put off when he tells her she has OCD and asks if she’s gotten any help for it. I knew he was trying to be helpful, but I also wanted her to tell him it was none of his business. Still, she does need help, and I like how Haynes balances out Catherine’s wariness of Stuart with her desire to get better. Stuart gradually grew on me — I love how, despite his attraction to Catherine, he is first and foremost a friend. I kept wishing that he wouldn’t turn out to have some hidden agenda, that he really is as nice a guy as he seems. Lee is such a horrible, manipulative person, and the way he destroys Catherine is painstakingly, painfully methodical. Because Catherine’s relationship with Stuart unfolds in the book alongside her experiences with Lee, it is difficult to allow ourselves to trust Stuart, just as it must have been for Catherine as well.

Darkest Corner has been compared to S.J. Watson’s Before I Go to Sleep. Watson even blurbs Darkest Corner, calling it “intense, gripping and utterly unputdownable.” I am a huge fan of Before I Go to Sleep — I found it, quite literally, “unputdownable,” and it kept me up all night. Its premise of not knowing who you really area is terrifying.

I found Into the Darkest Corner difficult to put down as well, but more than that, I found it difficult to read. Catherine’s story gets into you, in a way the very best books — of any genre — do. Catherine battles not just Lee the person but, perhaps more difficult, Lee the memory, which haunts her even after Lee is behind bars. I cheered every time Catherine fought back. I wanted her to win, to beat Lee once and for all and finally get on with her life, even though I knew that no matter what, the scars left by her experiences will never fully go away. Catherine’s story feels real, ever last terrifying, tragic bit of it, and kudos to Haynes for not holding back on such a difficult subject. Brilliant book, one that will stay with you long after you’ve finished reading.

+

Thank you to Harper Collins Canada for an ARC of this book in exchange for an honest review.

Review | 4:50 from Paddington, Agatha Christie

As I’m writing this, it’s a beautiful spring day, and I’m on my balcony with a cup of coffee and an Agatha Christie novel. Hard to beat that for my idea of a perfect day off. Reading an Agatha Christie is always a treat, and I recently went wild at Turtle Creek Books, where they have a display stand of old Agatha Christie paperbacks, some editions of which even had ads! I’m a sucker for old books and for Agatha Christie, so you can imagine the self-control it took to leave that store with only two Christies.

I’ve always been much more of a Poirot than a Marple fan, and to be honest, haven’t even read a Tommy and Tuppence novel yet. What kind of Christie fan am I, eh? New book pledge for 2012: try a Tommy and Tuppence mystery. In the meantime, however, I still have quite a few Marples to catch up on, and one of them is the classic 4:50 from Paddington. As you may already know, I’m a total sucker for book design, and a major, major fan of the new Agatha Christie paperbacks from Harper Collins. Isn’t that cover just beautiful? My bookshelf has a mix of old, practically falling apart Agatha Christies that I couldn’t resist getting at second hand bookshops, and these beautiful Harper Collins paperbacks, which I also can’t resist just because they’re so pretty.

In 4:50 from Paddington, elderly lady Mrs. Elspeth McGillicuddy is on the train from Paddington when another train passes, going in the opposite direction. At one point, Elspeth’s window lines up with one of the windows of the other train, and she witnesses a man strangling a woman. She immediately reports it to the train staff, but when police check the other train, they fail to find a corpse. Who is the victim, who is the killer, and more importantly, where is the body? No one believes that Elspeth has even seen anything at all, except for Miss Marple, who knows that while elderly ladies may have a tendency to imagine things, Elspeth is not that type of elderly lady at all.

“I’m too old for any more adventures,” Miss Marple muses, just as she realizes how the murderer could have gotten rid of the body. It’s a brilliant idea, and in classic Christie fashion, we aren’t treated to it just yet. But we do know that, despite her age and inability to run around interrogating suspects, Miss Marple is definitely on the case! She enlists the help of Lucy Eyelesbarrow, an almost frighteningly efficient housekeeper who is like a younger, feistier version of Hercule Poirot’s secretary Miss Lemon. Upon Miss Marple’s instructions, Lucy finds employment in the Crackenthorpe household, with their house located close to the train’s route. This sets off the wonderfully convoluted, twisty, surprising Christie plot we’ve all come to love.

With all the Christies I’ve read, you’d think I’d have become used to her surprising plot twists by now. Not the case with this book. I literally gasped out loud at a startling revelation midway through the story. I was also a hundred percent sure I knew who the murderer was by the halfway point, only to be completely proven wrong in the final pages. So much for my detective skills. And bravo to Agatha Christie, for keeping even an avid fan in the dark.

One of my favourite things about Agatha Christie mysteries, other than the actual mystery, of course, is the characterization. So many Christie mysteries are also comedies of manner, and the Crackenthorpe drama in 4:50 from Paddington totally drew me in. I love seeing Miss Marple play matchmaker — despite never having married, she is clearly a romantic at heart, and her knowing little smiles give her prediction the weight of years of observation. As Lucy exclaims after Miss Marple guesses some men in love with her, at a different time, Miss Marple would have been considered a witch for all the things she knew.

Long-time Christie fans, definitely pick up 4:50 from Paddington, and Christie newbies, this is a great novel to get you into the Marple series. You can check out the beginning of the story here — I hope it hooks you like it did me! Finally, I’d like to end with this fun little passage that, to me, reveals so much about Miss Marple:

“Yes,” said Miss Marple. “I had thought of that.”

“I suppose you think of everything!” said Lucy bitterly.

“Well, dear, one has to really.”

Recap: 50 Book Pledge 2012

Have you signed up for the Savvy Reader 50 Book Pledge, from Harper Collins Canada? The idea is simple: pledge to make reading a priority, and read at least 50 books in one year (one book a week, with two weeks left over). The point isn’t so much the number of books you read, as it is about incorporating reading into your life, and as a lifelong book addict, I’m totally up for that! Find out more about how to sign up on the Savvy Reader blog.

As I mentioned, I’m a lifelong book addict. Remember Belle from Beauty and the Beast? That’s me. Without the romance and adventure and talking appliances, but definitely, the part about always having my nose in a book. Taking public transit, waiting in long lines, catching a coffee break — I usually have a book in hand.

More than that — I love talking about books! Do you ever approach random strangers and ask about the book they’re reading? I usually don’t, unless it’s a book I absolutely absolutely adore, but I do admit to sneaking a peek every now and then, and wondering what about the book the reader finds so fascinating. Point being, I just finished the 50 Book Pledge, and I thought of writing a blog post about my favourite books of the year so far. Then I realized I’d been really fortunate this year — I’ve read so many good books that I couldn’t choose any favourites!

Now, each of the books I’ve read touched me in different ways. If you’ve read any of them, I’d love to know what you thought of them!


Book I’ve recommended the most: Among Others, Jo Walton

Love, love, love this book! Dan from Raincoast Books called it a novel for book nerds, and I think that just about says it all. Seriously: if you love reading, if you love libraries, most especially if you love science fiction and fantasy — read this book.

Book that made me cry: A Monster Calls, Patrick Ness

I was an emotional mess the entire time I was reading this book. I did have a personal reason for being so affected by it, but from what I’ve heard, it’s touched a lot of others as well. Beautiful, haunting, and powerful.

Book I am most proud to have finished: War and Peace, Leo Tolstoy

Seriously, I’ve tried to read War and Peace several times over the past few years, and have never gotten past the first couple of chapters. So this year, I decided to hunker down and finished the damn thing. Main difficulty: I couldn’t read any other books while reading this, nor could I take too long a break between reading sessions, or else I would get completely lost about the characters. Good news: once I got to know the characters a bit better, I really got into the story. Enjoyable book.

Book that made me laugh: Dead Kid Detective Agency, Evan Munday

One of the most fun books I’ve read this year, this book kept me giggling throughout. Granted, it doesn’t take much to make me laugh, and I think there’s something geeky about Munday’s humour that just strikes a chord with mine. But seriously, any book with a glossary that includes Jackie Chan and tells anyone who doesn’t know who Jackie Chan is to “drop this book immediately” and rent “the Hong Kong stuff” is a total win in my book.

CLASSIC TREATS:

Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy, John Le Carre

Loved the movie, and am actually glad I saw it before reading the book. Remembering the movie and the actors helped me keep things straight. That being said, both book and movie are incredible.

Gathering Blue and Messenger, Lois Lowry

I’m a huge fan of The Giver but have never read its sequels. Now, with the final book in the series, Son, coming out in Fall 2012, I thought I’d give them a shot. Gathering Blue is amazing — not as magical as The Giver, but I love how it’s all about the power of art to shape a society’s future. Lovely message, especially for an art enthusiast like me. Messenger has some interesting points about selflessness and immigration policies, and was sadder than I expected. Personally, I wish the ending hadn’t left quite so many questions unanswered, but it seems to have been a conscious decision on Lowry’s part. On her site, she says “Of course every good book leaves one wondering, and the conclusion of the trilogy will, as well.”

Agatha Christie!

I love Agatha Christie’s mysteries, and reading a Christie is a total treat for me. This year, I’ve so far read three that I haven’t read before: 4:50 from Paddington, Crooked House and Dead Man’s Folly. Also a treat re-reading favourite Christies Death on the Nile and Murder at the Vicarage. And I’m only just realizing that a full tenth of the books I’ve read this year are Agatha Christie titles. Yikes!

On a side note: if you have never read an Agatha Christie, check out And Then There Were None, quite possibly my favourite Christie of all time.