I Try to Solve a Japanese Honkaku Mystery | The Inugami Curse, by Seishi Yokomizo

When the wealthy patriarch of the Inugami clan dies, his will brings into high relief all the jealousies, rivalries, and petty conflicts within his family members. Sahei Inugami’s will leaves his estate behind, not to his grandsons Kiyo, Take, or Tomo, but rather to Tamayo, the granddaughter of Sahei’s mentor and rumoured once-lover. In particular, Tamayo has three months to choose one of Sahei’s grandsons to marry, and her husband will inherit the estate.

If Tamayo refuses, or dies before the three months are up, she forfeits the inheritance, and control of the family business passes to Kiyo, assisted by Take and Tomo. The remainder of the estate will be divided into five, with one share going to each of the grandsons, and two shares going to Shizuma Aonuma, the son of Sahei’s former mistress.

If Kiyo, Take, and Tomo all refuse to marry Tamayo, or die before the three months are up, Tamayo receives the full estate, and is free to marry whomever she wants. 

It’s a set-up that practically guarantees extra-juicy family drama, and The Inugami Curse doesn’t disappoint. Secrets come to light; siblings and cousins turn on each other, and soon enough, people start getting killed. 

I absolutely adore this book! I enjoyed my previous adventure with Detective Kosuke Kindaichi, and this story was even more my kind of whodunnit. Whereas The Honjin Murders had a very Sherlock Holmes feel with the focus being more on the howdunnit of the locked room mystery, The Inugami Curse feels much more like my personal fave, Agatha Christie. There’s a whole cast of suspects, each of whom has varying degrees of motive and opportunity, and I feel like the psychology of these characters — or the whydunnit, so to speak, holds the key to identifying the killer.

Even better, the clues are easy enough to follow; Kindaichi even helpfully lists them all for us in a chapter called “A Monstrous Riddle.” Various revelations come to light about the characters, each of which disproves one theory or another while raising new possibilities. And one clue in particular has Kindaichi thinking that finally, the puzzle pieces are falling into place. 

Alas for my ego, all these clues just leave me more confused than ever. And honestly, fair play to the author: he did give me all the tools I need to solve this case; I just can’t make sense of how they all fit together. I especially appreciate how often throughout the novel I’d come up with a theory that I consider absolutely brilliant, only for Kindaichi himself (or worse, Police Chief Tachibana!) to bring up that very theory only a few pages later. The first time it occurred was within the first few chapters, so it was far too early for such a major reveal. And honestly, I just feel like this is the author’s way of thumbing his nose at readers like me for thinking we’re cleverer than we actually are.

am proud that at least I managed to guess a fairly big reveal. Does that reveal even matter in solving the mystery? I’m going to guess yes. As confused as I am with how the puzzle pieces fit together, I have two theories floating in my brain, and I’m just going to lock in the one my gut thinks is right. I have very little confidence I got it, but the next chapter is called “Confession,” so I figure it’s now or never for me to issue my verdict. 

(Side note: Yokomizo’s other mystery The Honjin Murders has pride of place as the one mystery where I read the big reveal before realizing I should’ve stopped reading and made my guess. So, I’m taking the fact that I actually stopped before the big reveal this time as a sign of progress. Go, me!)

Did I Guess Right?

Absolutely not, LOL. My verdict is not even close.

I did guess somewhat close to the truth with my second theory, which I ultimately discarded because I was giving myself a headache trying to make sense of it, and still couldn’t make the puzzle pieces fit together.

Gah, this was frustrating! I had the clues, but put the puzzle pieces together wrong. It’s like, if I’d only tilted my head in the other direction, or looked at a couple of key pieces of the puzzle from a different perspective, I might have figured it out. As Sherlock Holmes would say: I see, but I do not observe. Gah!

But honestly, fair play to Seishi Yokomizo. This was a very well-constructed puzzle, an absolute joy to read, and the ending turned out to be a touch more heartwarming than I expected. And really, this just makes me even more determined to solve my next Kosuke Kindaichi mystery. Onward and upward!

*** SPOILERS BELOW ***

Continue reading

2023 Recap: My Year with Christie

In 2023, inspired by booktuber emmie’s mission to solve The Murder of Roger Ackroyd, and the dozens of other similar booktuber videos since, I decided to try my own hand at outsmarting the Queen of Crime. Based on my blog recaps, I’ve done 10!

And how did I fare? Ahem…

  • The Moving Finger (Miss Marple) – no, not even close, alas
  • At Bertram’s Hotel (Miss Marple) – kinda? I figured out whodunnit, and parts of the howdunnit and whydunnit, so a half-victory rounded up to a win?
  • Cards on the Table (Hercule Poirot) – LOL no. But at least I was close. And honestly, this was so much fun to try to solve!
  • Murder in Mesopotamia (Hercule Poirot) – LOL, not even close. But kudos to Dame Agatha; this big reveal made me yell so loud I scared my cat away.
  • A Caribbean Mystery (Miss Marple) – nope, and this made me shake my head because the key clue seemed so obvious after the fact. This has also become one of my favourite Marples and overall Christies, because of how deliciously twisty it is.
  • Peril at End House (Hercule Poirot) – YES I DID!!! FINALLY!!! And not even in a half-victory-I-kinda-figured-stuff-out way, but in a full-blown YES I GOT IT victory! Woohoo!
  • Five Little Pigs (Hercule Poirot) – YES I’M ON A ROLL!!!! I must say, solving one of these is such a fantastic high!
  • Evil Under the Sun (Hercule Poirot) – And so my streak ends. No, I was not even close on this. Bah. How the mighty have fallen…
  • Hallowe’en Party (Hercule Poirot) – Yes, but this victory felt more puzzling than victorious for some reason. Poirot turns a bit philosophical in this one, and some of his meanderings threw me off.
  • Honourable Mention: A Haunting in Venice, the movie (very loosely) adapted from Hallowe’en Party – I watched that in the theatre, and I DID solve it before the big reveal. So there! (Maybe that’s why solving the book version felt more puzzling than victorious? Because possibly some of the elements from the movie played a role in my solving the book?)
  • A Pocket Full of Rye (Miss Marple) – kinda, yes. I got the whodunnit and their motive, but the method was all wrong, and my guess about an accomplice was totally off-base. So yet another half-victory rounded up to a win?

And there we have it! Out of the 10 Agatha Christie books I tried to solve, I got 3 fully right, and 2 partially (mostly?) right. Plus I did solve the movie adaptation. And honestly, that’s actually far better than I thought I did! Woohoo!

Christie Finale for 2023

My final Christie book for 2023 was, fittingly, none other than Hercule Poirot’s Christmas. I last read it over a decade ago, and couldn’t remember whodunnit, so I started taking notes to try to solve it. But as I kept reading, I realized I knew a couple of key elements, including the significance a key clue from the crime scene. So I figured I remembered the story more than I thought, likely from seeing the Suchet adaptation, and the more the clues started to point towards a particular suspect, the more confident I became that I remembered the story in full.

Did I Know Whodunnit?

LOL, no, as it turns out, the person I was so sure was the killer turned out to be innocent, and the killer was someone who I never even suspected. So Christie managed to get a final knockout blow in and secure her utter and undisputed dominance as Queen of Crime and mystery puzzler extraordinaire before the end of the year.

But 2024 is a new year! And there are many, many more mysteries for my little grey cells to solve!

Honourable Mentions: Japanese Honkaku Mysteries and Dorothy L Sayers

In an attempt to branch out beyond Agatha Christie (and really, soothe my ego by solving potentially simpler puzzles), I also tried my hand at solving Golden Age-inspired detective fiction from Japan and Christie’s Golden Age contemporary Dorothy L Sayers.

And how did I fare? Well…

  • The Decagon House Murders by Yukito Ayatsuji – LOL, no. My gut did lean towards the right answer, but my rational mind got in the way. I went with the answer that made sense but turned out to be wrong, so well done, Yukito Ayatsuji.
  • The Honjin Murders by Seishi Yokomizo – no, I didn’t, and worse: this mystery takes pride of place as the first story where I didn’t even realize the reveal was about to happen. I just kept reading and then accidentally learned the big reveal without meaning to. Still a good mystery, and I have a copy of another book in the series, The Inugami Curse, on standby for 2024.
  • Whose Body? (Lord Peter Wimsey) by Dorothy L Sayers.- yes, I did, but it didn’t carry the same thrill as solving a Christie. Sayers is pretty transparent about Lord Peter’s thought processes throughout, including all of his theories, so the big reveal was pretty obvious. That being said, I’ve since learned that Sayers was a very different kind of writer: she was less interested in creating a puzzle to be solved than in exploring / reflecting the social mores of her time. She’s an incredibly skilled writer, and while I didn’t enjoy this as much as Christie’s books, a blog commenter convinced me to try one of the later Wimsey books. So I have Gaudy Night on standby for 2024.