2023 Recap: My Year with Christie

In 2023, inspired by booktuber emmie’s mission to solve The Murder of Roger Ackroyd, and the dozens of other similar booktuber videos since, I decided to try my own hand at outsmarting the Queen of Crime. Based on my blog recaps, I’ve done 10!

And how did I fare? Ahem…

  • The Moving Finger (Miss Marple) – no, not even close, alas
  • At Bertram’s Hotel (Miss Marple) – kinda? I figured out whodunnit, and parts of the howdunnit and whydunnit, so a half-victory rounded up to a win?
  • Cards on the Table (Hercule Poirot) – LOL no. But at least I was close. And honestly, this was so much fun to try to solve!
  • Murder in Mesopotamia (Hercule Poirot) – LOL, not even close. But kudos to Dame Agatha; this big reveal made me yell so loud I scared my cat away.
  • A Caribbean Mystery (Miss Marple) – nope, and this made me shake my head because the key clue seemed so obvious after the fact. This has also become one of my favourite Marples and overall Christies, because of how deliciously twisty it is.
  • Peril at End House (Hercule Poirot) – YES I DID!!! FINALLY!!! And not even in a half-victory-I-kinda-figured-stuff-out way, but in a full-blown YES I GOT IT victory! Woohoo!
  • Five Little Pigs (Hercule Poirot) – YES I’M ON A ROLL!!!! I must say, solving one of these is such a fantastic high!
  • Evil Under the Sun (Hercule Poirot) – And so my streak ends. No, I was not even close on this. Bah. How the mighty have fallen…
  • Hallowe’en Party (Hercule Poirot) – Yes, but this victory felt more puzzling than victorious for some reason. Poirot turns a bit philosophical in this one, and some of his meanderings threw me off.
  • Honourable Mention: A Haunting in Venice, the movie (very loosely) adapted from Hallowe’en Party – I watched that in the theatre, and I DID solve it before the big reveal. So there! (Maybe that’s why solving the book version felt more puzzling than victorious? Because possibly some of the elements from the movie played a role in my solving the book?)
  • A Pocket Full of Rye (Miss Marple) – kinda, yes. I got the whodunnit and their motive, but the method was all wrong, and my guess about an accomplice was totally off-base. So yet another half-victory rounded up to a win?

And there we have it! Out of the 10 Agatha Christie books I tried to solve, I got 3 fully right, and 2 partially (mostly?) right. Plus I did solve the movie adaptation. And honestly, that’s actually far better than I thought I did! Woohoo!

Christie Finale for 2023

My final Christie book for 2023 was, fittingly, none other than Hercule Poirot’s Christmas. I last read it over a decade ago, and couldn’t remember whodunnit, so I started taking notes to try to solve it. But as I kept reading, I realized I knew a couple of key elements, including the significance a key clue from the crime scene. So I figured I remembered the story more than I thought, likely from seeing the Suchet adaptation, and the more the clues started to point towards a particular suspect, the more confident I became that I remembered the story in full.

Did I Know Whodunnit?

LOL, no, as it turns out, the person I was so sure was the killer turned out to be innocent, and the killer was someone who I never even suspected. So Christie managed to get a final knockout blow in and secure her utter and undisputed dominance as Queen of Crime and mystery puzzler extraordinaire before the end of the year.

But 2024 is a new year! And there are many, many more mysteries for my little grey cells to solve!

Honourable Mentions: Japanese Honkaku Mysteries and Dorothy L Sayers

In an attempt to branch out beyond Agatha Christie (and really, soothe my ego by solving potentially simpler puzzles), I also tried my hand at solving Golden Age-inspired detective fiction from Japan and Christie’s Golden Age contemporary Dorothy L Sayers.

And how did I fare? Well…

  • The Decagon House Murders by Yukito Ayatsuji – LOL, no. My gut did lean towards the right answer, but my rational mind got in the way. I went with the answer that made sense but turned out to be wrong, so well done, Yukito Ayatsuji.
  • The Honjin Murders by Seishi Yokomizo – no, I didn’t, and worse: this mystery takes pride of place as the first story where I didn’t even realize the reveal was about to happen. I just kept reading and then accidentally learned the big reveal without meaning to. Still a good mystery, and I have a copy of another book in the series, The Inugami Curse, on standby for 2024.
  • Whose Body? (Lord Peter Wimsey) by Dorothy L Sayers.- yes, I did, but it didn’t carry the same thrill as solving a Christie. Sayers is pretty transparent about Lord Peter’s thought processes throughout, including all of his theories, so the big reveal was pretty obvious. That being said, I’ve since learned that Sayers was a very different kind of writer: she was less interested in creating a puzzle to be solved than in exploring / reflecting the social mores of her time. She’s an incredibly skilled writer, and while I didn’t enjoy this as much as Christie’s books, a blog commenter convinced me to try one of the later Wimsey books. So I have Gaudy Night on standby for 2024.

Review | Anna O by Matthew Blake

AnnaOFour years ago, twenty-five-year-old Anna Ogilvy is found covered in blood and in a deep sleep at a campsite. Her two best friends are found nearby stabbed to death, and her parents have received a text from Anna, confessing to the murder. Anna’s deep sleep turns out to be a years-long coma, and she is given the moniker Sleeping Beauty. The prince tasked to wake her up is Dr Benedict Prince, a forensic psychologist who specializes in homicides committed whilst asleep. His dilemma: he grows to care for Anna and care about her story, yet as much as he wants her to wake up, her regaining consciousness means she’ll have to stand trial for her friends’ murders.

Anna O has a compelling hook, and the mystery behind what actually happened the night of the murders is gripping stuff. What actually happened that night? The only person who can tell us is fast asleep. And, if she committed these murders while asleep, can she actually be held criminally liable? The book also begins with the factoid that we spend about a third of our lives asleep, so adds another layer of intrigue.

Some elements don’t quite work as well: the conceit of a camp where people pay ridiculous amounts of money for their group to be split up into Hunters and Survivors, with the objective to be the last team standing after an overnight ‘battle’ just seems stupid. I get it for plot purposes, and I can imagine some terrible CEOs deciding that will be fun for company team building, but for wealthy families to have a fun weekend out? That stretches credulity. And for Anna’s wealthy family to randomly decide to do it, and also randomly decide to invite Anna’s two best friends is really more a plot device than an event that actually makes sense.

Anna and her friends also seem much younger than their mid-20s. There were occasional lines that reminded me Anna was an adult professional writer, but for most of the book, I kept picturing her and her friends as university students who publish their magazine as a side hustle. There’s something very young about the concept behind their publication, more like teenagers wanting to be edgy than adults who actually are.

Still, the twists and turns were interesting, and the big reveal made sense. When the events of that evening and the killer’s motive were revealed, there was that satisfying buzz. I did guess the big reveal, but not till fairly late, and it was nice to see how Blake dropped all these little clues along the way.

However, the major snag for me was how unnecessarily long Blake dragged out the ending. Without giving away spoilers, Dr Prince ends up moving to a different country maybe three fourths of the way through. A ‘mysterious’ patient (okay, it’s Anna; the book makes a big deal about who she could be, but duh) books an appointment, and what follows is a game of cat and mouse that just seems artificially drawn out rather than natural. You know how Nancy Drew books would end chapters on cliffhangers so that readers would keep reading? It kinda felt like that, except not done as well. Anna and Dr Prince have their appointment, and instead of Anna saying why she’s there, she then asks to meet Dr Prince for dinner. And when they meet for dinner, she then acts really coy and suggests they meet again at another time.

I understand that the author wanted to draw out the tension. But it just doesn’t work. Dr Prince’s anxiety also keeps rising with each meeting, since he’s afraid Anna plans to kill him, but because the set-up is so stupid (why would he keep meeting with her then?), I just got to the point where I wanted to scream at both characters to do something! Anything!

Unfortunately, Anna is a much more compelling character while she remained asleep. When the reveal does come, the events of that fatal evening do make sense…but they also remove so much of what made Anna interesting. The reveal deflates the Anna O mythos, and while it’s natural for the reality to be less interesting than the myth, it still felt like a letdown.

Worse, after things between Anna and Dr Prince finally come to a head, and the book finally seems like it’s reached its natural conclusion, there’s still a full other chapter to go. The epilogue reveals some new details, and these are indeed important to know, but they were also pretty easy to figure out from the rest of the novel. At the very most, this part merited a page, maybe two. Stretching it out into a full chapter just repeats a whole bunch of information, and I kept flipping the pages waiting to see if there was another major shocker that would make this section merit its length. (There wasn’t.)

So, overall, Anna O is a pretty good book. The hook is interesting, and even though I found the big reveal to be a let down, I still think the central mystery is fascinating. The novel just failed to stick its landing; the last few chapters were boring and unnecessarily drawn out, and the final chapter was the epilogue no one needed.

+

TW: animal death

+

Thank you to HarperCollins Canada for an e-galley of this book in exchange for an honest review.

Review | Gwen and Art Are Not in Love, by Lex Croucher

GwenAndArtThis book takes a cute spin on the traditional forced marriage (forced betrothal?) + fake dating premise. Gwen and Art are betrothed, but they’re very much not in love. Such a set-up usually promises an enemies-to-lovers romance, but in this case, both main characters are gay, and so they actually do find their happily-ever-afters with other people. Gwen harbours a years-long crush on Bridget, a badass knight and only female knight in the kingdom; Arthur starts off kissing a stable boy, but eventually develops feelings for Gwen’s studious brother Gabriel. When both main characters find out about each other’s romantic secrets, they agree to fake-date to get their parents off their backs.

It’s a cute premise, and one I’d expect to love. Unfortunately, the book started off slooooooow for me. The first couple of chapters failed to hook me at all, mostly because it took so long for the main characters to win me over and make me care about them. Gwen just seemed like a miserable person to spend time with, and while I can kinda see why she wouldn’t want to marry someone as irresponsible and unreliable as Arthur, the specific incidents she complained about just made her seem bratty and petulant.

Arthur won me over more quickly, partly because his struggles with alcoholism and a power hungry father made him a more nuanced and textured character from the get-go. But what really made Arthur’s scenes shine almost from the start is his side kick (body guard? man servant?), Sidney. To me, Sidney stole the show. I found him witty and compelling, and I would totally read a whole book about his misadventures and his eventual romance with Gwen’s maid.

In fact, Gwen and Arthur owe a lot to the secondary characters. Despite Gwen and Arthur eventually going through full character arcs (Gwen needs to learn to get over her cowardice, and Arthur needs to learn to step up to his responsibilities), it’s the secondary characters, specifically Sidney and Bridget, who drive the momentum of most of the plot. It isn’t until later in the book that Gwen and Arthur actually start taking matters into their own hands. When they do, the story definitely picks up, but it takes a while to get there.

The final third or so takes a sharp turn from lighthearted romance to inter-kingdom politics and battle. The seeds were planted throughout, and the climactic battle is certainly a powerful section. Both Gwen and Arthur have their respective moments to shine, and demonstrate their character growth.

But the eventual happy ending does come at a cost, and a rather surprising tonal shift that unfortunately felt rushed. And while the denouement makes sense, it also feels oddly flat. Not quite rushed and not quite perfunctory, but not quite satisfying either. There’s a rather momentous point in the battle that adds so many layers of complexity to what comes next, yet it feels like the ending glosses over all that and focuses only on the happily-ever-afters of the central romances. Don’t get me wrong: I love genre romance and I love happily-ever-afters. Yet in this case, it doesn’t quite hit its emotional mark.

+

Thank you to Raincoast Books for an e-galley of this book in exchange for an honest review.