I Try to Solve an Agatha Christie Mystery | A Pocket Full of Rye (Miss Marple)

20231203_154648

Okay, first of all, I’m 86% into this novel, and absolutely LOVING it! One of my favourite scenes in an Agatha Christie, bar none, is Miss Marple’s entrance about 40% through. First, she swans onto the Fortescue estate in a taxi:

So charming, so innocent, such a fluffy and pink and white old lady was Miss Marple that she gained admittance to what was now practically a fortress in a state of siege far more easily that could have been believed possible. Though an army of reporters and photographers were being kept at bay by the police, Miss Marple was allowed to drive in without question, so impossible would it have been to believe that she was anyone but an elderly relative of the family. [41%]

And then she reveals that she’s there not to investigate the suspicious deaths of the wealthy Mr and Mrs Fortescue, but rather that of their nervous, “rabbity” maid, Gladys, whom it turns out Miss Marple herself trained for the service.

“It was the clothes-peg that really worried me,” said Miss Marple in her gentle voice.

“The clothes-peg?”

“Yes. I read about it in the papers. I suppose it is true? That when she was found there was a clothes-peg clipped onto her nose?”

Pat nodded. The colour rose to Miss Marple’s pink cheeks

“That’s what made me so very angry, if you can understand, my dear. It was such a cruel, contemptuous gesture. It gave me a kind of picture of the murderer. To do a thing like that! It’s very wicked, you know, to affront human dignity. Particularly if you’ve already killed.” [42%]

I just LOVE this image of an elderly woman managing to get past police barricades because of her fluffy pink and whiteness. And then, to have all that fluff pull back to reveal an avenging angel set to get justice for a dearly cared for servant girl. How wonderful it is that the main victims for this killer are presumably the super wealthy husband and wife, and yet it is the naive and innocent maid whose death will bring about their downfall! These passages are Christie’s masterful pen at work, and I loved every second of it.

Now for the case:

The wealthy Rex Fortescue dies at work after drinking a cup of tea. Yet the poison, taxine, is slow-acting, indicating he must have ingested it while still at home. Oddly, his pocket is full of cereal, rye to be exact.

At first, Inspector Neele suspects Rex’s much younger second wife, Adele, who is beautiful and glamorous, and also having an affair. Yet she’s the next to turn up dead, of cyanide poisoning in her tea. Then finally, Gladys’ body is found; she may have witnessed something about Rex’s murder.

Tying all three together is the nursery rhyme “Sing a Song of Sixpence,” which includes a pocket full of rye, a queen dead after eating bread and honey, and a maid whose nose is pecked off by a bird. The nursery rhyme also features blackbirds, which may provide a clue to the killer’s motive.

As for suspects, there’s a whole household full of them. There are Rex’s three children with his first wife: eldest son Percival, main heir to his father’s business; black sheep son Lancelot, who was summoned back home after Rex and Percival had a falling out, and daughter Elaine, who was in love with a man her father disapproved of. There are also the respective romantic partners: Percival’s quiet and lonely wife Jennifer; Lancelot’s independently wealthy wife Pat; and Gerald, Elaine’s communist ex-lover who left when Rex threatened to disinherit her, and returned after Rex was killed. And of course, the servants: cool and efficient head maid Mary Dove, whom Inspector Neele describes as almost performing her name; grouchy butler Mr Crump, and his grouchy wife, whose talent as a chef keeps them both employed. There’s also Vivian Dubois, the man Adele was having an affair with, and possibly the women working at Rex’s office.

Upon much reflection, I’ve narrowed down my suspect list to two key players. Per usual, I’ll type it out below, and check back in to see how I did!

Did I Solve It?

Kinda? I figured out the mastermind behind the murders, and I figured out their motive. But I got the method wrong, and my guess on an accomplice was totally off-base. There were a couple of clues that I skimmed past that turned out to be significant (or rather, I figured they may be important, but couldn’t figure out how, so I forgot about them); and at least one major clue I thought was significant but turned out to be nothing.

So, technically, this is a win, because I did figure out whodunnit and why. But I missed so many of the details that I feel only semi-victorious.

And, honestly, I’m happy about it. Because the big reveal I did not guess made me gasp out loud, and question everything I thought I knew about this case. And that, to me, is the hallmark of the most satisfying Christie mysteries.

Plus, of course, Miss Marple as a fluffy and pink and white avenging angel = sheer perfection!

*** SPOILERS BELOW ***

Continue reading

Review | Redemption Paws Tarot

RedemptionPawsTarot

I came across Redemption Paws while looking up animal charities in Toronto, and to my delight, discovered that they had their very own tarot deck for sale! No, I really do not need a new tarot deck for my collection. And yes, I realize I already have a ton of animal-themed decks on my shelves. But: while I’ve seen (and very much appreciate) indie tarot creators who donate to animal charities, this is the first time I’ve seen an animal charity itself produce a deck. Which means that instead of 5-10% of the proceeds going to the charity, I figure the full profit from this deck must go to supporting this dog rescue’s work, right? Plus, the art is cute, and the shop happened to be on Black Friday sale when I checked, so I figured I may as well go for it.

No regrets. The deck came in the mail today, and already I’m in love. They’re standard tarot size, in a tuck box, and they riffle shuffle really easily. A quick note to beginners that the deck does not come with a guide, so you may need to look up card meanings online (I recommend Biddy Tarot).

Illustrated by artist Fikri Hidajat, this deck features colourful and playful doggy riffs on traditional RWS imagery. Take for example the anthropomorphic royals and court cards. The Empress has her sceptre and sheafs of wheat, and the Emperor has his majestic backdrop of mountains. And I don’t know why, but the floppy hats and serious expressions on the Page of Pentacles and the Page of Cups make me laugh.

RedemptionPawsRoyaltyRedemptionPawsPages

My favourite cards though are the ones where dogs are just being dogs, without the anthropomorphism. How adorably silly is this Fool? How fiercely protective is this pup in the 7 of Wands? And how much does the 9 of Cups doggy’s joy burst beyond the card’s borders?

RedemptionPawsFaves

I also love how the artist reimagined the Strength card. Not sure what kind of dog this is, or why they’re carrying a little pup in a sling, but the posture reminds me of those St Bernard rescue dogs who carry life-saving supplies up mountains. That’s clearly not what’s going on in this card, but I feel like this dog conveys a similar kind of strength in carrying a pup like this.

And of course, superhero doggo flying along with the wands in the 8 of wands. How adorable is that cape???

And finally, the 10 of Pentacles card is heartwarming in its depiction of a dog who has found lasting comfort and security with their trusted human. I do admit that as someone who lives with cats, this card also made me giggle. I feel like associating family and legacy with a beloved human is such a dog thing; my cat-themed decks may show cats lounging on pillows or enjoying saucers of milk, but I don’t think human beings tend to feature in them at all? Sigh…

RedemptionPawsWhimsy

Anyway, if you’re in the mood for a new tarot deck, or thinking of giving one as a gift, if you’re a dog lover and especially if you’re in the Toronto area looking to support a local animal charity this holiday season, the Redemption Paws tarot deck is available online for only CAD32. That’s similar in price or cheaper to a lot of mass market decks, and it’s for a good cause!

I Try to Solve an Agatha Christie Mystery | Hallowe’en Party (Hercule Poirot)

HalloweenParty

I’d given up on trying to solve Hallowe’en Party, because I couldn’t wait any longer to see the Kenneth Brannagh film adaptation A Haunting in Venice. But when I started reading the book again, I realized that the story was so drastically different that the motives and circumstances behind the crime, and possibly also the murderer, must be different in the book.

So, flush with my success in solving the movie version of this mystery, I decided to try my hand at the book. I’ll admit that my first attempt in trying to read this book and solve this mystery gave me a bit of a headache. Not only did we not know who the murderer was, we also didn’t know who their original victim must have been!

See, in the book version, Joyce Reynolds isn’t a psychic medium hired to channel the spirit of Rowena Drake’s dead daughter. Rather, she was a thirteen year old child who claims to have witnessed a murder a few years ago, but didn’t realize it was a murder until only recently. So when she turns up dead in the bucket used for bobbing for apples, it seems reasonable to assume that she was killed by whomever had committed that first murder, to keep her from revealing their identity.

Except that Joyce never actually said whose death was actually a murder, and so the next few chapters have Hercule Poirot basically compiling a list of mysterious deaths in the area over the past few years. The list of suspects, potential victims, and potential murders kept growing, and as much as I tried to keep track with my handy dandy notebook, my head hurt with trying to figure out what’s actually important information versus what’s just noise. It’s only on my second attempt to read it, and after watching the movie, that I think I managed to get some of the information straight.

There’s a shop assistant Charlotte Benfield who was killed on a footpath, and her two ex-lovers are suspects. There’s a schoolteacher Janet White who was killed on another footpath, who told her flatmate (and possible lover?) that there’s a man she was worried about.

There’s also a wealthy widow, Mrs Llewellyn-Smythe, who died of heart failure. Interesting note here is that her will had a handwritten codicil leaving everything to her au pair, Olga Seminoff. The codicil was later determined a forgery, Olga goes missing (but keeps writing letters to a friend for at least six months after), and Mrs Llewellyn-Smythe’s estate instead goes to her niece and nephew, Rowena Drake and her husband. (Like the movie, Rowena also hosted the Halloween party. And I don’t think the movie covered her husband, but here, he was disabled and died in a car accident.)

There’s also Lesley Ferrier, who was knifed in the back. He’s a notorious womanizer and the general consensus is that the husband of one of his lovers killed him, but he also worked at the law firm representing Mrs Llewellyn-Smythe’s estate, so hmm…

Poirot also seems really interested in Mrs Llewellyn-Smythe’s sunken garden, which she created with the aid of Michael Garfield, a handsome landscape architect. She left him the garden and a house as long as he kept it up for visitors to enjoy, but it seems he sold it to someone else? There’s also a scene that gives me weird vibes, where Michael sketches a 13-year-old girl, Miranda, who was Joyce’s best friend. She keeps asking where the wishing well is in the garden, and Michael tells Poirot he pretends there is one for her sake, but there really isn’t; there used to be a lucky tree but it was struck down by lightning. Anyway, the creepy vibes I got were from the adult man just randomly sketching a young girl and saying she’s someone he wouldn’t forget even when he moves away. Eww?

Back to the mystery: which death did Joyce witness and recognize only later as murder? Who was the murderer? And given that barely anyone at the party paid Joyce’s story any attention, why even bother killing her over it? And perhaps some of these stories are just noise, but perhaps also some of them are relevant. How?

This book is far twistier and more convoluted than the movie adaptation, for all the ghosts and jump scares Brannagh added in. I have a wild guess, but my gut is that my guess is far more convoluted than the solution actually is.

Did I Solve It?

Huh, I actually did. Or rather, I solved a chunk of it, and the remaining pieces of the puzzle were only possibilities I mentioned in passing but didn’t actually bother to consider in full. So, not quite feeling like it’s cause for a full celebration, but more feeling confused that I actually did figure most of it out. That’s pretty cool.

This is such a twisty Christie, and I’m not sure how I feel about it yet. I do appreciate how it confused the heck out of me, but also, I’m not sure I enjoyed her writing in this quite so much as in some of her earlier books. Poirot’s observations get a bit philosophical / poetic / flowery at times, and he makes some off-the-wall observations that feel Marple-esque but don’t quite work as well with him. Possibly all part of Poirot being older in these stories, but I think I prefer his earlier mysteries.

*** SPOILERS BELOW ***

Continue reading